(Total Views: 621)
Posted On: 04/24/2020 7:28:53 PM
Post# of 148949
henry f wrote:
It means only that he is going to tell us whether or not the BLA has been completed and, if not, when he expects it to be completed.
_____________________________________________________
If BLA was "completed" then why it was not "filed"? Let me quote NP again:
"Updates on Completion of BLA Filing."
And if it was "filed" where is the official PR?
Also, is there a difference between BLA being 'completed' and 'filed'?
But most mind-boggling is the word 'update'. How is it possible to update something which is 'completed' or 'filed'? I see only one possible interpretation. NP plans to update us on the progress of preparing the BLA to be filed with the FDA In other words, the BLA has not been 'completed' let alone 'filed'. Is this important? I think, yes. On Monday, the shorts may use the ambiguity of NP's language and false expectations it has raised to drive us back to mid $2 range.
It means only that he is going to tell us whether or not the BLA has been completed and, if not, when he expects it to be completed.
_____________________________________________________
If BLA was "completed" then why it was not "filed"? Let me quote NP again:
"Updates on Completion of BLA Filing."
And if it was "filed" where is the official PR?
Also, is there a difference between BLA being 'completed' and 'filed'?
But most mind-boggling is the word 'update'. How is it possible to update something which is 'completed' or 'filed'? I see only one possible interpretation. NP plans to update us on the progress of preparing the BLA to be filed with the FDA In other words, the BLA has not been 'completed' let alone 'filed'. Is this important? I think, yes. On Monday, the shorts may use the ambiguity of NP's language and false expectations it has raised to drive us back to mid $2 range.
(1)
(0)
Whatever happens, we have got
Le-Ron-Li-Mab, and they have not.
Le-Ron-Li-Mab, and they have not.
Scroll down for more posts ▼
