(Total Views: 496)
Posted On: 04/04/2020 1:16:27 PM
Post# of 72440
I have been an IP investor since. 2013. I’ve met Leo twice in that time. I send, infrequent, emails of encouragement. Over the eight years I think I have had one reply. When I write have have no expectation of a reply. Leo is responsible. He is savvy. A CEO should not be communicating status or inferring positive or negative status to individual shareholders. Whenever I read one of these, “Leo wrote me...” posts I have to be skeptical.
Innovation Pharmaceuticals will flourish if our candidate drugs are successful. Investors will profit if our candidate drugs are successful. My “feelings” about potential success mean nothing. For that matter Leo’s “feelings” about the potential success of B or K mean nothing. Efficacy demonstrated through controlled, clinical testing is the only thing that matters.
Leo shouldn’t be sending messages to shareholders. Shareholders, even for all the right reasons, shouldn’t be transmitting Leo’s communications. Or, worse still, inventing exchanges to bolster their confidence or the confidence of investors.
I wish all of you health and happiness. To the extent that IPIX contributes to that wish...only time will tell.
Innovation Pharmaceuticals will flourish if our candidate drugs are successful. Investors will profit if our candidate drugs are successful. My “feelings” about potential success mean nothing. For that matter Leo’s “feelings” about the potential success of B or K mean nothing. Efficacy demonstrated through controlled, clinical testing is the only thing that matters.
Leo shouldn’t be sending messages to shareholders. Shareholders, even for all the right reasons, shouldn’t be transmitting Leo’s communications. Or, worse still, inventing exchanges to bolster their confidence or the confidence of investors.
I wish all of you health and happiness. To the extent that IPIX contributes to that wish...only time will tell.
(6)
(1)Scroll down for more posts ▼
