(Total Views: 329)
Posted On: 04/02/2020 5:25:33 PM
Post# of 72447
No, it is not merely opinion that Dr. Smith's claims have MANY problems with them. It is FACT.
He is not disclosing crucial data, as detailed in my previous post.
When someone makes a claim, and does not disclose data to back up those claims, those claims are unsubstantiated and should be viewed with skepticism.
Science is about proof. Just stating claims with only partial data is NOT proof.
I still want to know how many of his patients ended up on ventilators. But he won't tell us.
I want to know how many of his patients went directly to an ER instead of to him. But he didn't tell us that either.
And I want to know how many of his patients came to him with mild symptoms, and whether he VERIFIED THAT THEY HAD COVID-19 WITH TESTS, or whether he just ASSUMED that they had it. Remember, tests are hard to come by.
So no. It is a FACT that his data is UNSCIENTIFIC AND SUSPECT.
But hey, he got some good publicity out of it, didn't he?
He is not disclosing crucial data, as detailed in my previous post.
When someone makes a claim, and does not disclose data to back up those claims, those claims are unsubstantiated and should be viewed with skepticism.
Science is about proof. Just stating claims with only partial data is NOT proof.
I still want to know how many of his patients ended up on ventilators. But he won't tell us.
I want to know how many of his patients went directly to an ER instead of to him. But he didn't tell us that either.
And I want to know how many of his patients came to him with mild symptoms, and whether he VERIFIED THAT THEY HAD COVID-19 WITH TESTS, or whether he just ASSUMED that they had it. Remember, tests are hard to come by.
So no. It is a FACT that his data is UNSCIENTIFIC AND SUSPECT.
But hey, he got some good publicity out of it, didn't he?
(5)
(0)
