Yes. So far the court victories for RMHB have been a HUGE success, and the preferred shares had already been canceled following the first ruling. The court simply changed the ruling to comply with the "one-satisfaction rule". When the court ruled in RMHB's favor for both the cancellation of the Series A Preferred Shares and the $3.5 million restitution, it apparently constitutes a "double recovery" which is in violation of the one-satisfaction rule.