(Total Views: 615)
Posted On: 02/14/2020 7:24:56 AM
Post# of 154492
These are superb news !!!
However, here are inconsistencies.
We where working with Patient #3 as having EMT of 7 at the beginning. Then CTC = 0, EMT=2 at Wk 2 then CTC and EMT =0 latter (according to my notes from previous interviews/communications). I might be wrong.
New data:
Patient #2: (M-I-l) has now CTC+EMT = 0 (app. wk 10 measurement)!!!
Patient #4: CTC, EMT 8 to 2
One way or another the updates are extremely encouraging to put it mildly (I am trying to restrain myself).
To put it simply, the ORS of all these patients has been increased !!! (this is what a drug is supposed to do)
I hope patient #3 is clarified !!!
However, here are inconsistencies.
We where working with Patient #3 as having EMT of 7 at the beginning. Then CTC = 0, EMT=2 at Wk 2 then CTC and EMT =0 latter (according to my notes from previous interviews/communications). I might be wrong.
New data:
Patient #2: (M-I-l) has now CTC+EMT = 0 (app. wk 10 measurement)!!!
Patient #4: CTC, EMT 8 to 2
One way or another the updates are extremely encouraging to put it mildly (I am trying to restrain myself).
To put it simply, the ORS of all these patients has been increased !!! (this is what a drug is supposed to do)
I hope patient #3 is clarified !!!
(1)
(0)
