(Total Views: 512)
Posted On: 02/09/2020 7:33:35 PM
Post# of 149070
“We will address all this at our next presentation. For now please note that 350, 525, and 700 mg all will be considered and our amazing results for patient #1, 3 and 4 were with 350 mg. Patient #2 was allowed to receive 700 mg.”
Everytime NP clarifies an issue, more confusion is created: I was under the impression, and I think others were too, that patient number 4 was an emergency patient with mBC, not mTNBC. This is why when he read the lab results regarding her progress this past week, he only included CAML and not CTC because CTC isn’t a part of the emergency IND protocol.
Maybe I’m confusing myself and only his MIL got the 700mg because she was stage 4? And patient #4 is mBC but is going to dose escalation route?
Everytime NP clarifies an issue, more confusion is created: I was under the impression, and I think others were too, that patient number 4 was an emergency patient with mBC, not mTNBC. This is why when he read the lab results regarding her progress this past week, he only included CAML and not CTC because CTC isn’t a part of the emergency IND protocol.
Maybe I’m confusing myself and only his MIL got the 700mg because she was stage 4? And patient #4 is mBC but is going to dose escalation route?
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
