Quote:

---

Your edit still refers to the second patient as the third patient in the mTNBC trial. You’d need to change it to “second patient” or change the “mTNBC” to “general mBC” to fix the issue.

---

Honestly I don’t think so, because it is the third patient and they are in the mtnbc. And the heading makes it clear they are giving data on the third patient, which was enrolled in the mtnbc trial, which when I read the pr, that was what I was thinking.
And of course JMO, I see you and understand others disagree completely.