(Total Views: 376)
Posted On: 01/31/2020 10:27:49 AM
Post# of 43065
i think it's even more *desperate* for Non Retail ..
i strongly suspect .. based on input .. that various brokerage
firms' *loan outs to NR for a fee* of PTOI *shares* has had a clamp
come down .. now is that clamp because of *gleaned info* by *all with interest*
or because loan outs haven't been returned .. tipping %s towards *risk* ..
and i'm not talking actual P2O investors' *risk* .. which of course is a given
using TDA for example .. say a total of 16 Million PTOI *shares* are held
(cash accounts)
firm's in house analysis reveals that majority of those 15M *shares* aren't traded
and only a few are (less than 1M) held via GTCs (placed for sale by retail investors)
so using 15M .. loan out % @ 10% = 1.5M .. @ 20% = 3M
for years this *exchange for a $fee* works .. volume is decreasing
(reminder 36M ~ for 2013/2014 .. to 13M and change 2017/2018)
so CEs' (brokerage firms are colluding entities) took little *risk* on
these cash account loan outs .. no *retail* investor would have a clue
because the % loaned out wouldn't run higher than a % of aggregate held
and then along comes 2019
with no fanfare .. all with interest got to learn of the Patent issued by Canada
and PTOI (the stock) had its first 1M plus volume day (1.29.19) since June 2017
and interestingly (pattern wise) NR tipped their hand by revealing a 54% hidden trade %
on that 1M~ *volume* day
more telling in 2019 .. because CONtra to NRs' blather .. it isn't *retail*
that illegally manipulates PTOI .. it's the decade + embed .. long since
UPSIDE DOWN .. that does .. PTOI saw *volume* increasing in 2019
with the *final effort and redux set up* of November 2019
which btw might have worked if embedded NR could have *afforded* a higher take up
than 11c (round trip effort 035 to 11c vs April 2011's *effort* of 80c to 3.00)
of course besides NRs' affordability factor in 2019 .. it was clear at least 2 crews
that work the vehicle of choice had interest and appeared *primed* to work PTOI
.. something imo that couldn't come to pass if embedded NR entity were to hold 11c .. and like NRs' *clamp* .. crews' interest went *poof* via the vehicle fo choice
but anyway it's sliced .. out of the 24M~ PTOI volume in 2019 ..
CDEL & NITE (for their *efforts*) took a % .. a surgical (not retail) buyer
took a % and retail took a %
the 640M$ ? imo remains .. who is the surgical buyer?
imo *surgical buyer* conservatively accessed 4M PTOI *shares* in 2019 ..
based on CDEL & NITE's totals/resets/%s for their NR handlers .. and imo
retails' buys of approx 2M .. it is quite possible the surgical buyer/s .. picked
off between 4M and 8M in 2019 .. one reason why i'm so curious about PTOI's
volume in the first Q (or 2) in 2020
i also strongly suspect the now *known* value assigned a private company's first site/install in the U.S. also creates an issue for NR
all of NRs' BS spewed for years .. evaporates with either of these 8Ks' filed by P2O
the first is X buyers' feedstock is successfully processed by 3/Flagship
and/or
P2O is in receipt of funds from X buyer for first sale
for a fact .. P2O (the company) becomes a buyout candidate with the 8K filed by P2O that 3/Flagship has processed buyers' separate avenues of feedstock
and it's just one reason why i'm so curious as to *intent* re: surgical buyer of PTOI in 2019
here's to repairs ..
4kids
Being short PTOI shares has to be very very expensive which explains all the negativity by those who own no shares. The small share structure coupled with the availability of modestly priced shares encourages longs to keep on adding as they are able especially now that many brokerage firms no longer charge commissions. A few thousand shares here and a few thousand shares there accumulates to a tidy sum over time and trapped the shorts between a rock and a hard spot. Never thought I would have anywhere near the number of shares as I do today. Wouldn't surprise me if the shorts attempted a buyout to solve their issues here but I would hope management is armed and ready for any/all dirty tricks attempted by those that are short. Go PTOI!!!
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z6CcdXX4Pb
i strongly suspect .. based on input .. that various brokerage
firms' *loan outs to NR for a fee* of PTOI *shares* has had a clamp
come down .. now is that clamp because of *gleaned info* by *all with interest*
or because loan outs haven't been returned .. tipping %s towards *risk* ..
and i'm not talking actual P2O investors' *risk* .. which of course is a given
using TDA for example .. say a total of 16 Million PTOI *shares* are held
(cash accounts)
firm's in house analysis reveals that majority of those 15M *shares* aren't traded
and only a few are (less than 1M) held via GTCs (placed for sale by retail investors)
so using 15M .. loan out % @ 10% = 1.5M .. @ 20% = 3M
for years this *exchange for a $fee* works .. volume is decreasing
(reminder 36M ~ for 2013/2014 .. to 13M and change 2017/2018)
so CEs' (brokerage firms are colluding entities) took little *risk* on
these cash account loan outs .. no *retail* investor would have a clue
because the % loaned out wouldn't run higher than a % of aggregate held
and then along comes 2019
with no fanfare .. all with interest got to learn of the Patent issued by Canada
and PTOI (the stock) had its first 1M plus volume day (1.29.19) since June 2017
and interestingly (pattern wise) NR tipped their hand by revealing a 54% hidden trade %
on that 1M~ *volume* day
more telling in 2019 .. because CONtra to NRs' blather .. it isn't *retail*
that illegally manipulates PTOI .. it's the decade + embed .. long since
UPSIDE DOWN .. that does .. PTOI saw *volume* increasing in 2019
with the *final effort and redux set up* of November 2019
which btw might have worked if embedded NR could have *afforded* a higher take up
than 11c (round trip effort 035 to 11c vs April 2011's *effort* of 80c to 3.00)
of course besides NRs' affordability factor in 2019 .. it was clear at least 2 crews
that work the vehicle of choice had interest and appeared *primed* to work PTOI
.. something imo that couldn't come to pass if embedded NR entity were to hold 11c .. and like NRs' *clamp* .. crews' interest went *poof* via the vehicle fo choice
but anyway it's sliced .. out of the 24M~ PTOI volume in 2019 ..
CDEL & NITE (for their *efforts*) took a % .. a surgical (not retail) buyer
took a % and retail took a %
the 640M$ ? imo remains .. who is the surgical buyer?
imo *surgical buyer* conservatively accessed 4M PTOI *shares* in 2019 ..
based on CDEL & NITE's totals/resets/%s for their NR handlers .. and imo
retails' buys of approx 2M .. it is quite possible the surgical buyer/s .. picked
off between 4M and 8M in 2019 .. one reason why i'm so curious about PTOI's
volume in the first Q (or 2) in 2020
i also strongly suspect the now *known* value assigned a private company's first site/install in the U.S. also creates an issue for NR
all of NRs' BS spewed for years .. evaporates with either of these 8Ks' filed by P2O
the first is X buyers' feedstock is successfully processed by 3/Flagship
and/or
P2O is in receipt of funds from X buyer for first sale
for a fact .. P2O (the company) becomes a buyout candidate with the 8K filed by P2O that 3/Flagship has processed buyers' separate avenues of feedstock
and it's just one reason why i'm so curious as to *intent* re: surgical buyer of PTOI in 2019
here's to repairs ..
4kids
Being short PTOI shares has to be very very expensive which explains all the negativity by those who own no shares. The small share structure coupled with the availability of modestly priced shares encourages longs to keep on adding as they are able especially now that many brokerage firms no longer charge commissions. A few thousand shares here and a few thousand shares there accumulates to a tidy sum over time and trapped the shorts between a rock and a hard spot. Never thought I would have anywhere near the number of shares as I do today. Wouldn't surprise me if the shorts attempted a buyout to solve their issues here but I would hope management is armed and ready for any/all dirty tricks attempted by those that are short. Go PTOI!!!
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z6CcdXX4Pb
(2)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
