There is nothing erroneous or potentially erroneous in the 1st paragraph of my initial reply to thirtycents, and all of it relates to the potential significance of one sentence which would be construed as a warranty. The rest of the paragraph is couched in conditional language, and obviously wasn't intended to cover language not available for review. That this proved beyond your ability to grasp is not my problem.

Transactional lawyers draw contracts as a customary, primary part of their practice. Litigators do not. But the final aspect of a lawsuit that settles involves the preparation and execution of settlement agreements, which usually contain boilerplate provisions. Some, however, require tailored terms.