(Total Views: 244)
Posted On: 01/17/2020 3:57:19 PM
Post# of 7802
Re: Coat Tail Rider #5632
Who said Tinkerbell 2.0 didn't exist? The CONcept most certainly exist.
As for the gadget itself, I have said the specimen that was REFUSED when submitted to the USPTO in the misleading application did not exist.That was last fall.
I went on to say what they submitted, the Buck-Rogers-mobile, would not exist for at least 3 years. I meant that as a built-from-scratch gadget to becoming fully operational.
That may have an existing platform they're using and have modified, but it wouldn't resemble the Buck-Rogers-mobile. And guess what....they haven't release a photo or other likeness of Tinkerbell 2.0, which according to the paid promo worked last July.
Then a later paid promo proclaimed it would be working .....soon.
Believe whom you wish. This gadget isn't going to be built from scratch to fully operational in less than 3 years.
As for the gadget itself, I have said the specimen that was REFUSED when submitted to the USPTO in the misleading application did not exist.That was last fall.
I went on to say what they submitted, the Buck-Rogers-mobile, would not exist for at least 3 years. I meant that as a built-from-scratch gadget to becoming fully operational.
That may have an existing platform they're using and have modified, but it wouldn't resemble the Buck-Rogers-mobile. And guess what....they haven't release a photo or other likeness of Tinkerbell 2.0, which according to the paid promo worked last July.
Then a later paid promo proclaimed it would be working .....soon.
Believe whom you wish. This gadget isn't going to be built from scratch to fully operational in less than 3 years.
(1)
(0)
