I have had several posts deleted there (ihub).

Part of the finding of the truth is to respond with your opinion of what is being said (for or against).

The problem is that if you are against some opinions bases on false premises, citing one's facts, the posts get deleted here. The result: a slanted non-objective orientation that does not help anybody.

I think the best moderator for any BB is one: expression of facts. Some times we make mistakes and we express facts that are wrong (out of honest ignorance, or misunderstanding, or information from wrong sources, or faulty interpretations), and other collaborators point one's in the right direction. Or they are. That is fine and is the whole purpose of a BB.

The issue arises when some contributors have and agenda and the mods agree with them. Facts don't matter any more and repetition of half-truths are intended to change opinions to affect the SP movement in their direction of interest.

In any case, I believe this board is being been objectively (with facts) and we are profiting intellectually and otherwise from it.

Kudos to the mods.