Quote:

---

Because "something prolly exists" sounds rather vague.

---

When you leave out the part about Tinkerbell 2.0 not being proprietary it obviously must have been confusing.

Feel free to try again. Let me help and I'll rephrase.

Something (Tinkerbell 2.0) prolly exist but likely is NOT proprietary.

Quote:

---

I know the scientist actually working on the Seasearcher looked at all of the existing technology before beginning work on the Seasearcher because I asked months ago if they had.

---

Wow, you know the scientist (singular) working on Tinkerbell 2.0?

Big whoop!

Quote:

---

Do you think if you were developing a 'gold and treasure-finding machine' that you would be sharing information on its development with the general public as you went along?

---

Again, it's likely not proprietary. So I won't play along with the BS hype.

I can't wait to see who's technology they're using. They've even dropped the word proprietary after Indy decided to leave.