HHIGambler,

I agree with you. It takes as well some some humility to expose your personal situation to the public. I appreciate that.

However, the motive of the interview still bothers me. As I mentioned before, it was either he wanted to share his mother improvement (for which I am very happy), share with with us the scientific opinions of Dr. B. Patterson (very valuable but perhaps out of context) or, simply, tell us that the deal was OFF.

What bothers me is he said that he could sign it, meaning, it has been finalized but he is not signing it ... I am taking NP verbatim here, he said: "we now are pausing a little bit in our licensing agreement even though we could sign that agreement ...".

Now, why did he do this odd interview? If we don't receive some clarification soon my conclusion is simply that we do not have a good deal even if it has been concluded.. Something happened, not necessarily bad, and I hope there is forthcoming clarification as now we know the licensing is not happening and we don't know what is happening.

What are your thoughts as of the WHY of the interview ??

IMHO