(Total Views: 543)
Posted On: 11/28/2019 2:01:47 AM
Post# of 82689
I am not patting myself on the back, but here is my last post, and probably the last post I will ever get over there (I threw a little shade):
You failed to grasp the ultimate message of my last post. Inferior minds tend to miss obvious conclusions. The only documentation I need to provide is that EndpointLock is absolutely, indisputably, undeniably the intellectual property of Strikeforce. Regardless of the underlying mechanics of the deal between ACS and DSS, SFOR is making money in this relationship. EndpointLock is going to Asia. SFOR is making money in Asia. Tell the me how ACS could possibly be selling EndpointLock without paying SFOR? It is not legally possible. Whether ACS is funneling the money through a subsidiary or a shell company or a Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme, it does not matter. If it has the EndpointLock name on it, SFOR is making money. That is how licensing, trademarks, and copyrights work. It's math, not magic. Spew any nonsense you want. Facts will overcome.
You failed to grasp the ultimate message of my last post. Inferior minds tend to miss obvious conclusions. The only documentation I need to provide is that EndpointLock is absolutely, indisputably, undeniably the intellectual property of Strikeforce. Regardless of the underlying mechanics of the deal between ACS and DSS, SFOR is making money in this relationship. EndpointLock is going to Asia. SFOR is making money in Asia. Tell the me how ACS could possibly be selling EndpointLock without paying SFOR? It is not legally possible. Whether ACS is funneling the money through a subsidiary or a shell company or a Bernie Madoff ponzi scheme, it does not matter. If it has the EndpointLock name on it, SFOR is making money. That is how licensing, trademarks, and copyrights work. It's math, not magic. Spew any nonsense you want. Facts will overcome.
(2)
(0)
