(Total Views: 456)
Posted On: 11/22/2019 12:01:41 PM
Post# of 82686
I'm getting private messages from several people and I'm not going to say who they are. My comments to all:
The 3 executives at SFOR are basically the founders, SFOR HAS NOT had executive turnover. SFOR believed strongly in their products way before the market was ready for them. Did you want someone to be an executive for,say, $50,000 in that region, especially when they needed to get Blank Rome (a believer of SFOR on board, and other deals in the works? Cheaper is not always better. It is unfortunate that Alice 101 has been dominating, and if it hadn't, we sure as hell would not be under a penny and having conversations as such. Here we are today, lets roll forward with the leadership we have, and maybe as things get even more interesting, SFOR might add more staff. Good things ahead!!!
The 3 executives at SFOR are basically the founders, SFOR HAS NOT had executive turnover. SFOR believed strongly in their products way before the market was ready for them. Did you want someone to be an executive for,say, $50,000 in that region, especially when they needed to get Blank Rome (a believer of SFOR on board, and other deals in the works? Cheaper is not always better. It is unfortunate that Alice 101 has been dominating, and if it hadn't, we sure as hell would not be under a penny and having conversations as such. Here we are today, lets roll forward with the leadership we have, and maybe as things get even more interesting, SFOR might add more staff. Good things ahead!!!
(6)
(0)
