Thank you for the manifesto. But my question directed to another poster was whether that poster believed he was entitled to Mr. Berman's investment. We have discussed at great length the issues of a cash dividend from any J&J settlement, which is so very funny, but I would also like to know if a vocal message board poster is now looking for a stock buy-back engineered by the Berman investments.

By the way, "The Board accepted this offer, which came without pre-condition." That's understood, right? Another way would be to say "no pre-condition."

Oh and one other thing. The first investment date of October 1, which has been treated as if Berman did something else illegally, is most likely because Mr. Berman waited for the new quarter for the loan disclosures rather than forcing them through in the 3rd quarter. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

Finally, I would think that someone who appears to be a seasoned investor, seasoned enough to moderate multiple message boards, would know the difference between a shareholder buying shares on the open market, and the rights associate with that type of transaction, and Mr. Berman's loans of money. But I guess not.

All IMO.