(Total Views: 302)
Posted On: 11/06/2019 4:20:02 AM
Post# of 1034
as of sept 30 the CR is better than 2:1 which is good- with CA of 5.789M vs CL of 2.802M
dont know what 3d interpretation will cost- not easily discoverable via the internet-though remember one rumbling re xxx /sq mile for the 3d itself?
as just noted they say they have funds through mar 2020- 10q portion i posted- though there's mention of additonal funding possibly required to finish the data interpretation- if so another fundraising period is imminent?
macros have for the most part still been the controlling factor imo in pps fluctuations, as they have for most oil and gas companies this year-irregardless of progress on the ground
dont know what 3d interpretation will cost- not easily discoverable via the internet-though remember one rumbling re xxx /sq mile for the 3d itself?
as just noted they say they have funds through mar 2020- 10q portion i posted- though there's mention of additonal funding possibly required to finish the data interpretation- if so another fundraising period is imminent?
macros have for the most part still been the controlling factor imo in pps fluctuations, as they have for most oil and gas companies this year-irregardless of progress on the ground
(1)
(0)
