The (ahem) unofficial PR’s from the paid for promo in which SFRX was cited as the source and it’s peeps were interviewed were linked on SFRX’s “official” website shortly after the paid for PR and promo interview were released. Then weeks later the scrubbing began.

The squirming and dodging trying to pretend you didn’t make a false claim is freakin’ hilarious.

I’m pretty sure I know why the “alleged” historical significance was not in the report.

Thanks for confirming.