(Total Views: 409)
Posted On: 09/17/2019 8:31:11 PM
Post# of 40991
Previous discussions on dilution here were accurate.
Several suggested we'd bottom around 3 due to that dilution, and we appear to have done that.
Now you appear to be suggesting a bottom around 1.5 for this dilution. I guess that also makes sense.
Others have claimed that Steve is never done diluting. They ALSO appear to have been correct.
None of this sounds good for shareholders.
Why is an audit so difficult? It's not nearly as expensive have some have said, and regardless surely we can afford it if the financial statements are accurate.
Why is this so hard? Why are fellow shareholders willing to go to the mat defending Steve, when he refuses to do the couple things that could easily turn this around?
Something continues to be not-quite-right here.
Several suggested we'd bottom around 3 due to that dilution, and we appear to have done that.
Now you appear to be suggesting a bottom around 1.5 for this dilution. I guess that also makes sense.
Others have claimed that Steve is never done diluting. They ALSO appear to have been correct.
None of this sounds good for shareholders.
Why is an audit so difficult? It's not nearly as expensive have some have said, and regardless surely we can afford it if the financial statements are accurate.
Why is this so hard? Why are fellow shareholders willing to go to the mat defending Steve, when he refuses to do the couple things that could easily turn this around?
Something continues to be not-quite-right here.
(1)
(0)
