As much as I want the same details as you do about #2 IMHO he has given us all the info he legally can in that interview and "many emails". It stinks to be in the subservient position of supplier to vendor (like McAfee) because they call the shots PR wise due to their NDA and/or the Federal Government's Confidentiality Statement. What we have to go on is 280,162 reasons from ACS. Also, Mark stated Q3 the same, but Q4 even better! That tells me he expects more from ACS who has demonstrated the SFOR shield at a try before buy DoD Contractor simulated cyber attack exercise. Bo Dietl would not have been there demonstrating our IP without DISA approval. That's good enough for me to continue to trust Mark Kay.