I know the technologies already exist. They even admit that in their BS document submitted to the USPTO, which suggests Tinkerbell 2.0 works better than anything else on the market.

There's no freakin' way they'll develop anything proprietary anytime soon.

They'll prolly just modify an existing platform and add existing sensors.

Since Kyle has a long and verifiable history of misleading investors, along with yourself, it's likely he'll do just that while you and NOAD suggest it is all proprietary.