How can we prove you wrong when you dismiss all criticism without consideration of it's truth? You cannot take criticism. All you do is counterattack because you think you are never, can never be, wrong.

What if Chawlston is right? Just consider that, instead of attacking him with a similar mental issue that he brought up about you.

You said, "prove me wrong". You are wrong for always taking an adversarial position only about a fact that the company has not "proven" to you and they are mostly about a future event that has not yet occured or some confidential company info that has not been released. By definition those things can't be proved because they haven't happened or are secret. That does not mean you can claim you are right. You have not proved you are right because you fail to consider the facts in their true context. First, the context of the business plan. They are and have executed it culminating in the Assam contract. Second, the facts are that revenue is coming from qd film, QDLED and QDSC. All those fall under company trade secrets. AMTRON is proof their concepts and QD product is valid. The fact that these two facts have no validity to you because some event hasn't happened yet is bogus because investors and traders will at some point recognize the the untapped and undervalued stock and raise the price dramatically way before a product comes to market. That will happen before your concept of proof happens because investors take the probability of future events into consideration, unlike you.

Don't think you can claim you are right from this post, if anything your denials and counterattack will prove Chawlston is right.