(Total Views: 226)
Posted On: 07/26/2019 10:52:13 AM
Post# of 2064
You made a good point and thanks for reposting the earlier PR where the outline is pretty much what was done.
If they'd indicated in the June 3rd PR that the pilot was only 2500 tons that would have been even better but the results may not be too far out of line with their stated plan. The grade cited in the most recent PR didn't live up to the 1.8 g/t mentioned in earlier PR but it's an allowable deviation.
They dinked around a long time to only load 2500 tons but I think the crew is small and maybe only operating two pieces of equipment at a time so it's not a very efficient operation - my guess. Not there so don't really know. .
If they'd indicated in the June 3rd PR that the pilot was only 2500 tons that would have been even better but the results may not be too far out of line with their stated plan. The grade cited in the most recent PR didn't live up to the 1.8 g/t mentioned in earlier PR but it's an allowable deviation.
They dinked around a long time to only load 2500 tons but I think the crew is small and maybe only operating two pieces of equipment at a time so it's not a very efficient operation - my guess. Not there so don't really know. .
(0)
(0)
