(Total Views: 381)
Posted On: 07/25/2019 2:17:06 PM
Post# of 82676
Along those lines, large companies and law firms are constantly sending people to other cities, and those people are constantly working on their laptops and phones. And I know for a fact, at least at my firm, that cyber security while traveling has become a major concern, especially with the GDPR and the huge fines being levied. Large companies and firms are going to be looking for hotels that offer something like this, as soon as they learn of its availability. If I am the CTO of a fortune 500 company and I know 50 of my employees are going to be staying in New York for a conference, I am going to strongly recommend to my BOD that they are booked in hotels that offer SFOR's product. And any other business traveler, who is earning Hilton points anyway, is likely to sign up for the yearly subscription. I see this as nothing but a positive. Will this result in MASSIVE revenues in the next 2Qs? No way...but over the next 5 years? I can see that happening.
I will be the first to admit, prior to the Fed. Cir. ruling against SFOR, I was someone who saw SFOR as a get-rich-quick opportunity. If SFOR had won that patent, I truly believed we would see a share price over a dollar within a few days. That clearly did not happen. However, even though I am not going to get rich quickly, that does not mean SFOR is a bad long-term investment. Quite the opposite. I now see SFOR as an opportunity to grow slowly, and build a client base through channel partners. It was hard to admit I was wrong, but now that I've torn off that Band-Aid, it feels good to see SFOR for what the company really is.
People like to complain that this company has been around for 18 years without making a profit. But how many penny stock companies can you name that have lasted almost 2 decades? That is proof positive that this company is no gimmick or fly-by-night shell looking to screw shareholders. On that same note, how many penny stock companies have taken litigation all the way to the SCOTUS? Things have not gone SFOR's way for a loooooooong time, but in my opinion, we are finally in a place and time where people and other companies are ready to realize SFOR's products are exactly what they need to protect themselves from harm and loss in their increasingly digitized day-to-day lives. SFOR's time is here, and PRs like this are the tip of the iceberg.
How do you eat an elephant???
SFOR long and strong!
I will be the first to admit, prior to the Fed. Cir. ruling against SFOR, I was someone who saw SFOR as a get-rich-quick opportunity. If SFOR had won that patent, I truly believed we would see a share price over a dollar within a few days. That clearly did not happen. However, even though I am not going to get rich quickly, that does not mean SFOR is a bad long-term investment. Quite the opposite. I now see SFOR as an opportunity to grow slowly, and build a client base through channel partners. It was hard to admit I was wrong, but now that I've torn off that Band-Aid, it feels good to see SFOR for what the company really is.
People like to complain that this company has been around for 18 years without making a profit. But how many penny stock companies can you name that have lasted almost 2 decades? That is proof positive that this company is no gimmick or fly-by-night shell looking to screw shareholders. On that same note, how many penny stock companies have taken litigation all the way to the SCOTUS? Things have not gone SFOR's way for a loooooooong time, but in my opinion, we are finally in a place and time where people and other companies are ready to realize SFOR's products are exactly what they need to protect themselves from harm and loss in their increasingly digitized day-to-day lives. SFOR's time is here, and PRs like this are the tip of the iceberg.
How do you eat an elephant???
SFOR long and strong!
(8)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
