Nowhere did I claim they are not "real." My opinion may be that they are not real, and that opinion, like many others who share that opinion, is based on what information is currently available.

However, the point is, one can suggest all they want that they are real, but there is zero proof that they are real. And, as I said, there is more proof suggesting that they are not.

That aside, the rebuttal to "there's no proof the revenues are real" is not "there's no proof that they're not!"

That's a double negative, empty argument.

You have to PROVE that something DOES exist when you make claim it does.

Currently, there is ZERO actual PROOF the revenues represent anything more than unfulfilled, paper contracts booked as sales.

Can you prove otherwise? No, you cannot. That is a big problem.