I reply to you, multi-identity, because you say everyone else has to have evidence for their statements, but then you state your (incorrect) opinion as fact.

There is evidence that there was a leak, based on the huge volume and giant move up, with no evidence of pumping on the stock chat boards for this largely unknown stock.

To claim that a "pump" operation was in action when there was in fact no pumping to retail investors demonstrates that you are incorrect.

The preponderance of evidence is that there has been some kind of leak.

And the fact that there has not YET been a press release does not mean that there will NOT be a press release.

Please, let's have a higher level of bashing, if bash you must.