(Total Views: 380)
Posted On: 05/03/2019 7:35:22 PM
Post# of 82676
I would agree with you Caruso! I’m sure that along with mutual respect and confidentiality, there are contractual aspects to which we are not privy! And rightfully so, as the contracts are between our channel partner and a 3rd party firm! They are not between SFOR and the 3rd party firm. NDA’s may also be in play.
If anyone feels strongly enough about disclosure about SFOR’s technology in play within the agreement/contract, then they should address it with SFOR! They can express their concern/displeasure as to SFOR’s use of channel partners to expand utilization of their technology. Bottom line is they will be attempting to tell Mark how the company’s sales contracts should be drawn up and executed! Good luck with that effort!
Bottom line is that neither ACS or the 3rd party firms with whom contracts are signed, have any responsibilities or obligations to SFOR shareholders. People here need to temper their frustrations, and at least direct them to SFOR, as they are the only party with responsibility for addressing shareholders’ concerns!
All IMHO
If anyone feels strongly enough about disclosure about SFOR’s technology in play within the agreement/contract, then they should address it with SFOR! They can express their concern/displeasure as to SFOR’s use of channel partners to expand utilization of their technology. Bottom line is they will be attempting to tell Mark how the company’s sales contracts should be drawn up and executed! Good luck with that effort!
Bottom line is that neither ACS or the 3rd party firms with whom contracts are signed, have any responsibilities or obligations to SFOR shareholders. People here need to temper their frustrations, and at least direct them to SFOR, as they are the only party with responsibility for addressing shareholders’ concerns!
All IMHO
(7)
(0)
SFOR STRONG!!! GO SFOR!!!
Scroll down for more posts ▼
