(Total Views: 474)
Posted On: 05/03/2019 9:30:26 AM
Post# of 82690
O.Trader Good Morning, Video
Your Post Prompted a Video yesterday.
I don't no where the 93B Transaction Number Comes from ? Although when Numbers get that high, iYour in the Ball Park.
and can anyone verify ACS/SFOR actually gets paid per Transaction ?
First Data Processes 2,500 Transactions a Second. When calculating that out, There are 86,400 seconds in a day × 365 days, that works out to 77.7B.
This works out close to the First Data Number at the bottom of This Page (2019) stating 79B, at the top of that page linked it states 2,500 Transfer actions per second. https://www.firstdata.com/en_us/about-first-d...facts.html
No matter how one looks at it those are almost incomprehensible Numbers to Phantom.
I thought the Board might like to understand better How First Data can Process that many Transaction. While also taking a swipe at the LieHub in the Processs.
VIDEO : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IxhdDWqmKzhj...p=drivesdk
However we are getting paid per Transaction or ?????, even Q2 Revenues should Look Sweet !
Your Post Prompted a Video yesterday.
I don't no where the 93B Transaction Number Comes from ? Although when Numbers get that high, iYour in the Ball Park.
and can anyone verify ACS/SFOR actually gets paid per Transaction ?
First Data Processes 2,500 Transactions a Second. When calculating that out, There are 86,400 seconds in a day × 365 days, that works out to 77.7B.
This works out close to the First Data Number at the bottom of This Page (2019) stating 79B, at the top of that page linked it states 2,500 Transfer actions per second. https://www.firstdata.com/en_us/about-first-d...facts.html
No matter how one looks at it those are almost incomprehensible Numbers to Phantom.
I thought the Board might like to understand better How First Data can Process that many Transaction. While also taking a swipe at the LieHub in the Processs.
VIDEO : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IxhdDWqmKzhj...p=drivesdk
However we are getting paid per Transaction or ?????, even Q2 Revenues should Look Sweet !
(5)
(0)
