I only say that because the last time, there seemed to be some confusion. Steve was focused on getting current and apparently applied all cash reserves to that end while dale and Brian started down the path of getting revenue from free gold but decided for the sake of efficiency to forego the free gold extraction (during dredging) which would have allowed immediate cash flow at the cost of less sand accumulated. Both paths were were flawed and non-coherent. If corporate is gonna focus on funding, then, there better be lots of good news and revenues to shout about otherwise the financing terms are going to be less beneficial. If the field is focused on requiring additional equipment before revenue, you need to save the cash reserves for said equipment. Either strategies would have worked. Unfortunately, the melding of the two resulted in lots of stock piled sand and no money to grow. They were not on the same page. All I am asking is that they both stay on the same page and focus on cash flow. Keep in mind they will be faced with another 10k audit coming up and it sure would be nice to have the cash flow to afford said audit.

DSUS -