(Total Views: 552)
Posted On: 04/26/2019 8:41:01 PM
Post# of 82686
Context matters, before Alice came to power, those projections were not out of the realm of being reasonable.
Cisco/Duo and the other roll out of new infringers settling triple damages and paying license fee alone might allow SFOR to reach $10 or $20 a share reach those figures but ultimately everyone would be paying SFOR to use OOBA. I stand buy it.
But with Alice that was literally robbed from us. Very disappointing.
WE still have potential to reach .20 .30 or.50 cents maybe more depending on First Data , DSS, Gallagher , BlockSafe and others.
But the law suits are not out of play. We have a solid patent that the government made unenforceable and needs to restore the rightfulness of it. When it is restored the PPS in the dollars is back within reach of SFOR and their shareholders.
But making making those claims of $10 to $30 dollars a share NOW which I have not, of course would be unreasonable.
Maybe that was an oversight on your part. Or maybe you want to vent. Whatever.
Cisco/Duo and the other roll out of new infringers settling triple damages and paying license fee alone might allow SFOR to reach $10 or $20 a share reach those figures but ultimately everyone would be paying SFOR to use OOBA. I stand buy it.
But with Alice that was literally robbed from us. Very disappointing.
WE still have potential to reach .20 .30 or.50 cents maybe more depending on First Data , DSS, Gallagher , BlockSafe and others.
But the law suits are not out of play. We have a solid patent that the government made unenforceable and needs to restore the rightfulness of it. When it is restored the PPS in the dollars is back within reach of SFOR and their shareholders.
But making making those claims of $10 to $30 dollars a share NOW which I have not, of course would be unreasonable.
Maybe that was an oversight on your part. Or maybe you want to vent. Whatever.
(3)
(0)
