It's time for this to resolve one way or the other. I still don't have any reason to believe Steve is a fraud. There is no hard evidence. I keep thinking of Jenkins. He has a family, reputation, and a career. Steve talked, in public, multiple times over the last 18 months or so about Jenkins - when he joined the firm, where he was traveling, the potential he has to contribute to ONCI deals, how much he meant to our company, etc. Question. Why would Jenkins allow Steve to continually mention Jenkins details if the details were made up? If Steve is a fraud then all of his associates and business partners named in ONCI releases are accomplices. If my name was being thrown around in public by a person I knew to be lying I would find a way to shut them down - cease and desist, lawyer up, whatever. Jenkins would not allow his good name to be sullied by a fraudster and neither would the half a dozen other pros named by Steve and multiple business partners.