(Total Views: 512)
Posted On: 04/16/2019 4:41:46 AM
Post# of 82676
Thanks for the response. I believe it's imperative that SFOR continues to defend their IP. Otherwise, anyone can continue to use it to their benefit.
To be honest, R&G was a big factor in my investment with SFOR. I hate to see them go. The other major factor was the perception of profitability through sales and recurring revenue streams Mr. Kay has been broadcasting. I hope this happens, I know the SFOR team is working hard to make it happen.
I know/ understand the 2018 10k is in the rear view, but I can't recall seeing so many negative forward looking guidance, especially in all caps. Has anyone else?? Of course it's a legal requirement for protection. So maybe it's nothing to worry about since Mr. Kay is promising profitability. Yes, when a CEO says something it's a promise that is accountable.
To be honest, R&G was a big factor in my investment with SFOR. I hate to see them go. The other major factor was the perception of profitability through sales and recurring revenue streams Mr. Kay has been broadcasting. I hope this happens, I know the SFOR team is working hard to make it happen.
I know/ understand the 2018 10k is in the rear view, but I can't recall seeing so many negative forward looking guidance, especially in all caps. Has anyone else?? Of course it's a legal requirement for protection. So maybe it's nothing to worry about since Mr. Kay is promising profitability. Yes, when a CEO says something it's a promise that is accountable.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
