PP....If you want to quote ME....(as opposed to an anonymous poster...which is also your line of BS) it best not be taken out of context to tickle your agenda.

Quote:

---

Seriously... Heddle could PR that The process has been recently patented in Canada, under final review in the States, and is currently being considered by a number of companies both in Canada and the States...and that very well might be enough to put a choke hold on these nasty manipulators. The reality is that the patented process isn't a hoax or a scam...neither is the machine...and the only point of a PR that may be considered a "pump" is the companies that may or may not be looking into the process...only because Heddle has been keeping things "mum" on the shareholder communications...ie...it could very well be true. If I were in his shoes, I'd be doing the same thing...he's got plenty invested in this...and would probably love to see an appreciation of his holdings through a number of PR's and updates...only a matter of time.. hold 'em!!

GL PTOI'rs

---

So as you can clearly see....my post addresses my attitude towards a PR...or the conditions regarding it. So...take all your BS nonsense...and go write a column on ...oh....I don't know.....the complexities of being an anal retentive adolescent...from which you could most probably incorporate first hand experience into your elaborate memoirs.