Curious why something like this gets a drawn out explanation, while all we get is "36" lol. That being said, I think it's a good thing being they ruled NOT PATENT eligible for this case, where as ours, they hardly could say anything of that nature. This is far from over....

ps this case is a pretty good read

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/fi...6-2019.pdf