(Total Views: 208)
Posted On: 02/26/2019 4:15:49 PM
Post# of 36570
Again, not trying to be a jerk, but there is no proof that Drexel is rose or namtae. I suggested they talk/write the same, but that doesn't mean they are. I believe that is what skipper is referring too. There is no proof to the conclusion. So just like you might get upset with Drexel for making unprovable statements, you can't state as fact that Drexel is rose or namtae without proof. It's a chicken before the egg situation. Or cart before the horse. Or TC before RJS...lol
All we can do is answer the questions, or statements, and let the investors make their own decision as to who makes the most sense. I think most investors are pretty smart and can read who is most likely not a supportor of the stock and take that with a grain of salt. Also I hope investors are not getting all their trade information here and relying on any one of us to make their purchase/sale decision. That would be truly scary.
All we can do is answer the questions, or statements, and let the investors make their own decision as to who makes the most sense. I think most investors are pretty smart and can read who is most likely not a supportor of the stock and take that with a grain of salt. Also I hope investors are not getting all their trade information here and relying on any one of us to make their purchase/sale decision. That would be truly scary.
Quote:
Skipper it looks like I touched a sore spot with you. Fine - volley with Rose/Drexel all you want!
(1)
(0)
Disclaimer: Of course, all of this is my opinion and you should not make any investment decisions based on my opinion. I have not received any non-public information.
