(Total Views: 370)
Posted On: 02/25/2019 7:14:52 PM
Post# of 11803
From the filing and there is a lot of good reading: Time to settle down in the big chair with a fine glass of my wine and see what we have.
Pg 21
In November 2018, the Company brought suit in Pennsylvania. The Company filed the complaint to name, among others, defendants including those persons who owned stock in the Company who may have traded stock in the market based on information and documents we believe was provided by Shasta, or who, we believe, were given confidential documents by Shasta, gained through the litigation discovery, or who, we believe, have libeled and threatened the Company’s CEO, his son, and wife. Most of the information provided by Shasta to these shareholders was later posted on public Internet message boards. In January 2019 the Company was awarded judgment against Shasta for $3.6 million in this matter.
Pg 21
In November 2018, the Company brought suit in Pennsylvania. The Company filed the complaint to name, among others, defendants including those persons who owned stock in the Company who may have traded stock in the market based on information and documents we believe was provided by Shasta, or who, we believe, were given confidential documents by Shasta, gained through the litigation discovery, or who, we believe, have libeled and threatened the Company’s CEO, his son, and wife. Most of the information provided by Shasta to these shareholders was later posted on public Internet message boards. In January 2019 the Company was awarded judgment against Shasta for $3.6 million in this matter.
(4)
(0)
