(Total Views: 415)
Posted On: 02/20/2019 7:25:38 PM
Post# of 82689
Well guys after going over the briefs and SA argument and SFOR argument. this is what came to me and you guys can chime in.
The best inventions are often times the simplest. There is no room for "interpretation" either your using it or your not. I think SA understood who their audience was and they kept it incredibly simple so that a high schooler could understand the IP and what was going on. RG did not. Sometimes when i try to explain the IP to people they don't get it. Maybe RG was too technical or complex. I think they may need to dumb their argument down some and make it simple. LESS IS MORE SOMETIMES. Keep it simple. SA did that twice and won twice.
Thoughts?
The best inventions are often times the simplest. There is no room for "interpretation" either your using it or your not. I think SA understood who their audience was and they kept it incredibly simple so that a high schooler could understand the IP and what was going on. RG did not. Sometimes when i try to explain the IP to people they don't get it. Maybe RG was too technical or complex. I think they may need to dumb their argument down some and make it simple. LESS IS MORE SOMETIMES. Keep it simple. SA did that twice and won twice.
Thoughts?
(2)
(0)
