exactly .. PTOI never deserved the first *run* of December 2009 .. tho' at this point imo based on actual *volume* of that first run (statistically irrelevant in 2019) .. subsequent hand off *volume* in 2010 .. the factual reality that many (not all) early/original investors never sold one share *then* .. and the ensuing cycles of money in play by NR .. last *round* (that was then) called in RT (real time) stoppage @ 1.50 (1.49 in fact) of January 2013 .. that was 6 years ago .. since then stock has been held (for the most part) @ sub 6c

what is interesting about this latest *effort* .. remains NYSDEC *activity* and more than a few actual P2O investors' observations that a *run* looked like it was en route over the past months

of course any *run* brings PTOI back full circle .. to the issue of *volume*

something that factually PTOI has far less of than the last *efforts* in play (2013's 36M and change)

facts are a funny thing

so no .. PTOI never deserved the *run* of 2009 .. but it also never deserved the *efforts* in play to part a significant chunk of actual *shares* out of actual investors via the relentless PPS compression of the last 6 years

and there in lies NRs' dilemma in total if or when P2O actually files measurable progress

4kids