(Total Views: 301)
Posted On: 01/09/2019 9:12:43 AM
Post# of 15624
I can't post anymore today on the other board, but I would like to respond as to why the October 11, 2016 or matters viewable here.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/owc-...31521.html
In this pr the company announced the beginning of efficacy testing and then new er followed up on this pr. If there was in fact a test no harm no foul. But shortly after this pr the stock price doubled. And then soon ran to $3 and Jeffery freidland illegally dumped his shares.
If there was no test, this pr is fraudulent and can link the company to freidland pump and dump scheme. So there better damn well have been a test.it opens the company up to liability and a lawsuit if there never was one.
I do not think this has adequately been looked into. Based on the timelines alone.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/owc-...31521.html
In this pr the company announced the beginning of efficacy testing and then new er followed up on this pr. If there was in fact a test no harm no foul. But shortly after this pr the stock price doubled. And then soon ran to $3 and Jeffery freidland illegally dumped his shares.
If there was no test, this pr is fraudulent and can link the company to freidland pump and dump scheme. So there better damn well have been a test.it opens the company up to liability and a lawsuit if there never was one.
I do not think this has adequately been looked into. Based on the timelines alone.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
