Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Home
  • Mailbox
  • Boards
  • Favorites
  • Whats Hot!
  • Login - Join Now!
Political Debate Board
(Total Views: 59)
Posted On: 12/21/2018 7:44:53 AM
Post# of 65629
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: Lmcat #55512
Funny how this is gaining no traction whatsoever.

What Steele actually stated:


http://www.norcalblogs.com/postscripts/2018/1...don-court/

Quote:

"Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election,"



The only thing this confirms is that Steele was on the right track before just about anyone else. Note the words 'legally entitled'. if it's all bullshit, what are you Trumanzees worried about.

NONE of the indictments and convictions thus far are based upon the Steele dossier. No appeals on that basis either. Why not?


(0)
(0)









  • New Post - Investors HangoutNew Post

  • Public Reply - Investors HangoutPublic Reply

  • Private Reply - Investors HangoutPrivate Reply

  • Board - Investors HangoutBoard

  • More - Investors HangoutMore

  • Keep Post - Investors HangoutKeep Post
  • Report Post - Investors HangoutReport Post
  • Home - Investors HangoutHome
  • Mailbox - Investors HangoutMailbox
  • Boards - Investors HangoutBoards
  • Favorites - Investors HangoutFavorites
  • Whats Hot! - Investors HangoutWhats Hot!
  • Settings - Investors HangoutSettings
  • Login - Investors HangoutLogin
  • Live Site - Investors HangoutLive Site