(Total Views: 454)
Posted On: 12/17/2018 7:37:50 PM
Post# of 82686
ZP, I completely agree and personally expect a decision before Oral argument although I'd like to see R&G Shock & Awe at Oral argument destroy this Alice 35 101 notion forever.
Ropes & Gray submitted a 'Supplemental Authority' two weeks ago based on the Ancora precedent and stated that the Court 'must reverse' the lower district court's decision. They never mentioned delaying for Oral argument.
Knobbe Martens played along and responded that the Federal circuit court 'should uphold' the lower courts ruling based on Ancient Greece ideology and a Preschool analogy.
The critical 2017 Boston, Mass. "Markman Hearing" between SFOR/Ropes & Gray and Vasco, Gemalto & Entrust was also about the validity of SFOR patents. I understand that at that "Markman hearing" last year the Judge actually laughed as the attorneys for G,V & E used the same ancient Greece/WWII/Preschool argument being used by SecureAuth's Knobbe Martens. As we know, SFOR won the hearing. So there is also precedent to the argument currently being used in this case as well.
Ropes & Gray submitted a 'Supplemental Authority' two weeks ago based on the Ancora precedent and stated that the Court 'must reverse' the lower district court's decision. They never mentioned delaying for Oral argument.
Knobbe Martens played along and responded that the Federal circuit court 'should uphold' the lower courts ruling based on Ancient Greece ideology and a Preschool analogy.
The critical 2017 Boston, Mass. "Markman Hearing" between SFOR/Ropes & Gray and Vasco, Gemalto & Entrust was also about the validity of SFOR patents. I understand that at that "Markman hearing" last year the Judge actually laughed as the attorneys for G,V & E used the same ancient Greece/WWII/Preschool argument being used by SecureAuth's Knobbe Martens. As we know, SFOR won the hearing. So there is also precedent to the argument currently being used in this case as well.
(11)
(0)
