$1? Not anymore. PNCH do bad PRs, Investors will never buy PNCH since there is nothing indcating $$ growth with any of the PRs while the company is really growing. No one reads filings for a sub penny stock unles the PR tittle makes you wana read that PR. Whats wrong of putting the PR tittle with the indication of how much you grow so far and make investors really look at the company.

Example : PNCH records 400% increase in Rev and 1000% increase in Assets Q3.

I still think there should be a good PR comes out outlines what the company a has done.

The art of PRs , lollll

JMO