(Total Views: 624)
Posted On: 11/29/2018 2:20:06 PM
Post# of 82676
25 claims against SFOR patents...completely rejected!!!
III. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, for the reasons given, we determine that the Petition does not establish a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that the challenged claims of the ’698 patent, claims 1–17, 19–24, 53, and 54 , are unpatentable. Thus, we do not institute inter partes review of any of the challenged claims on any of the asserted grounds. IV.
ORDER
Accordingly, it is: ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), the Petition is denied, and no trial is instituted as to any claim of U.S. Patent No. 8,484,698 B2.
Should review the entire judgement and the strength of SFOR patents here:
https://jumpshare.com/v/8edDCebJyRqat1hn4s6p
III. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, for the reasons given, we determine that the Petition does not establish a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that the challenged claims of the ’698 patent, claims 1–17, 19–24, 53, and 54 , are unpatentable. Thus, we do not institute inter partes review of any of the challenged claims on any of the asserted grounds. IV.
ORDER
Accordingly, it is: ORDERED that pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), the Petition is denied, and no trial is instituted as to any claim of U.S. Patent No. 8,484,698 B2.
Should review the entire judgement and the strength of SFOR patents here:
https://jumpshare.com/v/8edDCebJyRqat1hn4s6p
(7)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
