(Total Views: 228)
Posted On: 11/28/2018 9:44:56 PM
Post# of 4466
Re: DieselBuzz #4062
MMEX supporters are typically short on facts, and long on opinions.
It would be unlikely that an MMEX supporter could yield a single coherent, fact-based sentence, let alone a whole paragraph that makes the case for MMEX.
The facts about MMEX are abundant, and clear, in that the SEC filings, TCEQ application filing, and related documents show a rudimentary topping unit, which physics and chemistry dictate the operation, and output, limiting MMEX to intermediate stream output (were it to be built).
Please cite facts about the use of straight-run diesel in any direct market application. Please cite facts about the use of straight-run naphtha in any direct market application. Please cite facts about an isolated, small-scale crude topping unit that has ever generated revenue.
It would be unlikely that an MMEX supporter could yield a single coherent, fact-based sentence, let alone a whole paragraph that makes the case for MMEX.
The facts about MMEX are abundant, and clear, in that the SEC filings, TCEQ application filing, and related documents show a rudimentary topping unit, which physics and chemistry dictate the operation, and output, limiting MMEX to intermediate stream output (were it to be built).
Please cite facts about the use of straight-run diesel in any direct market application. Please cite facts about the use of straight-run naphtha in any direct market application. Please cite facts about an isolated, small-scale crude topping unit that has ever generated revenue.
Quote:
So many things wrong with this but I don't have the time to write 10 paragraphs. Thanks
(0)
(0)
