(Total Views: 538)
Posted On: 11/28/2018 9:34:16 PM
Post# of 72440
Thanks for clarifying. I understand the trading crews. What I don’t get is how they actually monetize their work. Are the clowns we see every day for years on end on ihub the principals or are they just the worker bees? If they have a large naked short since MAKO then they must be rewashing it over the years, not holding it. Which i think is what you’re saying with “cycle of money.” Essentially they need IPIX go under and disappear to avoid having to cover their short position?
How did they get around the name change from CTIX to IPIX?
Since they let the stock drop too low do they now need to let it run again so they can start over? It never made sense to me that they didn’t (don’t) let it run back a dollar or so and start over. That’s why I’ve assumed their goal is total destruction. When they let it go it goes up 50% to 60%+ on very little volume. It seems like the most recent “run” to .17 was not intended but the one to .20+ was.
Anyway...as I said before, it’s very confusing but your explanation in narrative form helped. I think.
Go IPIX!
How did they get around the name change from CTIX to IPIX?
Since they let the stock drop too low do they now need to let it run again so they can start over? It never made sense to me that they didn’t (don’t) let it run back a dollar or so and start over. That’s why I’ve assumed their goal is total destruction. When they let it go it goes up 50% to 60%+ on very little volume. It seems like the most recent “run” to .17 was not intended but the one to .20+ was.
Anyway...as I said before, it’s very confusing but your explanation in narrative form helped. I think.
Go IPIX!
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼