(Total Views: 72)
Posted On: 11/27/2018 3:45:49 PM
Post# of 65629
Why did WikiLeaks offer a $20,000 reward for information that leads to a conviction in the Seth Rich murder case if there was no connection between Assange and Rich??
Why didn't Clinton or the DNC offer a reward?????
Assange has never offered a reward of this magnitude, so it makes many believe that Seth played a pivotal role in helping Assange expose the DNC.
Seth worked in the voter database division, so he had access to the database centers–which could be how Assange gained access to all of the DNC’s data materials and emails. Rich worked inside the data hub of the DNC, which would easily explain how and where he gained access to the emails that were leaked.
If Seth Rich was in fact the source, then it would explain why Wikileaks would feel obligated to offer a reward. Why else would Wikileaks offer a reward for any DNC staffer who was murdered, or is Seth Rich’s case special?
Why didn't Clinton or the DNC offer a reward?????
Assange has never offered a reward of this magnitude, so it makes many believe that Seth played a pivotal role in helping Assange expose the DNC.
Seth worked in the voter database division, so he had access to the database centers–which could be how Assange gained access to all of the DNC’s data materials and emails. Rich worked inside the data hub of the DNC, which would easily explain how and where he gained access to the emails that were leaked.
If Seth Rich was in fact the source, then it would explain why Wikileaks would feel obligated to offer a reward. Why else would Wikileaks offer a reward for any DNC staffer who was murdered, or is Seth Rich’s case special?
(1)
(0)
