I respectfully disagree. There is nothing impractical about it. Any law firm of the size of R&G has the resources and staff to handle twice as many cases at any given time; especially if the cases are all essentially just one set of claims, merely substituting names of different defendants. Plus, it creates a huge rush among all the defendants to settle to avoid being the last one in line who will likely pay the most, due to all the precedent set by the others that settled first. The firm I work for has over 300 active cases in large securities class actions. It all depends on the size of the firm. R&G is plenty big enough.