(Total Views: 705)
Posted On: 11/08/2018 5:37:59 PM
Post# of 82676
Fantastic! It sure looks so as they are using the DFARS compliant logo on their websites!
https://fed360encrypt.securecyberid.com/
https://fed360auth.securecyberid.com/
“Our security solutions meet or exceed the Defense Federal acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) minimum security standards.
We facilitate and support the standards and best practices recognized and adopted within the NIST Cyber Security Framework 800-171.”
here are some other related links:
a) https://securecyberid.com/blog/2018/11/05/sec...r-attacks/
b) http://www.nbc-2.com/story/39418333/360-cover...ontractors
c) https://www.prweb.com/releases/360_coverage_p...875825.htm
d) See also original PR from SFOR
http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/05...ution.html
recent tweets:
2018.11.08 Strikeforce CEO, Mark Kay on twitter
https://twitter.com/marklkay2/status/1060637943830863872
tweet
Q: Mark, you have told many that you would PR any incoming deals that are sizable. Can we anticipate a revenue PR with regards to the @SecureCyberID and Gallagher announcement that came today? Thanks for confirming!
A: Yes I did and I can't pr this one, plus it already is out there.
2018.11.08 Strikeforce CEO, Mark Kay on twitter
https://twitter.com/marklkay2/status/1060647822704476160
tweet
Q: mark, can you explain the thought process on allowing your channel partners to have sub licensing capabilities. I can get behind the channel partners strategy but not allowing them to bypass SFOR. I’d appreciate any feedback you could give. Thanks!
A: Any reseller and distributor can sub license our products. They are not bypassing SFOR.
Q: Thanks for the response. Maybe that was a bad choice of words. Can they make separate agreements with these sub licensees? Does SFOR receive the same 15-20% from those companies or just the channel partners?
A: Defierent deals with some and I can't explain legally. But we typically make more.
https://fed360encrypt.securecyberid.com/
https://fed360auth.securecyberid.com/
“Our security solutions meet or exceed the Defense Federal acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) minimum security standards.
We facilitate and support the standards and best practices recognized and adopted within the NIST Cyber Security Framework 800-171.”
here are some other related links:
a) https://securecyberid.com/blog/2018/11/05/sec...r-attacks/
b) http://www.nbc-2.com/story/39418333/360-cover...ontractors
c) https://www.prweb.com/releases/360_coverage_p...875825.htm
d) See also original PR from SFOR
http://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/05...ution.html
recent tweets:
2018.11.08 Strikeforce CEO, Mark Kay on twitter
https://twitter.com/marklkay2/status/1060637943830863872
tweet
Q: Mark, you have told many that you would PR any incoming deals that are sizable. Can we anticipate a revenue PR with regards to the @SecureCyberID and Gallagher announcement that came today? Thanks for confirming!
A: Yes I did and I can't pr this one, plus it already is out there.
2018.11.08 Strikeforce CEO, Mark Kay on twitter
https://twitter.com/marklkay2/status/1060647822704476160
tweet
Q: mark, can you explain the thought process on allowing your channel partners to have sub licensing capabilities. I can get behind the channel partners strategy but not allowing them to bypass SFOR. I’d appreciate any feedback you could give. Thanks!
A: Any reseller and distributor can sub license our products. They are not bypassing SFOR.
Q: Thanks for the response. Maybe that was a bad choice of words. Can they make separate agreements with these sub licensees? Does SFOR receive the same 15-20% from those companies or just the channel partners?
A: Defierent deals with some and I can't explain legally. But we typically make more.
(8)
(0)
There are no guarantees in investing. No one should consider these pages or posts to be financial advice. Everyone has a responsibility to verify and thoroughly learn more than what is referenced or written here, and everyone must take responsibility for their own investing decisions.
Scroll down for more posts ▼
