It's also true that no one has any idea who is selling. And claiming as fact that someone 'must" be selling without any proof is something that should be presented as speculation, instead of the constant stating as fact that Aruda, or Aspire, or the Family Office, is selling.

No one knows who is selling. However, watching very strange trading behavior makes one question whether, for instance, a smart company like Aspire would put out 70k shares on the ask, and then pull the ask when a buyer comes in; or, putting huge lots on the ask so that the price is pushed down, so that they make less money. Really, who would do that?

Claiming that everything screwy we see in the trading behavior is just companies selling, is something that is illogical.

It's not all or one, you know. There could be Aspire selling and also shorting by other parties going on at the same time.

The only fact we know is: the only way to know who is selling would be to subpoena the market makers for trading records.
That can be done.