Believe me, I know exactly what platform we are trading on as stated in my previous message. Once again, here is an example of a “conditioned acceptance”. Just because we are trading on the otc pink sheets, does not justify any sort of white collar fraud. The SEC has been stepping up to the plate and imposing charges on CEO’s guilty of taking advantage of this trading platform along with higher exchanges. Bottom line, if statements are being made simply to prop up a share price so personal shares or any shares can be sold at artificially inflated share prices, the crime is fraud. I’m not stating this is happening here, but I sure as heck am posing the possibility that there could be a problem with SB’s validity. Step up SB, I’d be delighted to see you stand behind your own words and bring validity to this ticker. Here is a straight path. Resolve Delaware debt with immediacy. State private label identity. Reduce share count as stated so you don’t fall into the category of fraud with the SEC and shareholders. Move business to Colorado. Apply for the name and ticker change with FINRA. Provide audited financials as previously stated, once again so you don’t fall into the category of being a fraud. These are all your words SB. If you are out of your league as CEO, stick to sales and hire a CEO capable of follow through on his/her own statements.